We have sourced, tested, and used low-cost Asian solar panels — from reputable manufacturers. We don’t just investigate the panels themselves, we background-check the company that makes them. Solar panels carry 25-year warranties, and we want to make sure their manufacturers are financially sound and reputable, and will be around to support those warranties. This kind of careful research is an important part of the value we deliver to our customers.
We have a computerized pricing system that generates the total price for your solar project, based on the size of the system and your project specifics.
In general, the cost breakdown for a solar electric system is about 55-60% for the equipment itself (including panels, inverter, wire, conduit, switchgear, etc.); about 10-15% for overall project management, design, paperwork, permits and fees; and about 25-35% for the installation costs.
We can deliver excellent pricing on our projects thanks to two advantages: First, we pool our buying power with a national group of solar installers in a member-owned purchasing co-op to get advantageous pricing on the very best equipment (we will not compromise on quality where our reputation is at stake). Second, we are crazy about efficiency, and have been working for 14 years on how to deliver the very best-performing and longest-lasting solar installations with the least waste possible, thereby turning our customers into raving fans. It is a formula that works.
Solar is a new, emerging industry. To date, there are no industry standards for how to predict the energy output of a completed solar system in the real world. Each solar sales person can use his own assumptions in making this prediction. Some are intentionally optimistic, some are naïve and don’t have enough experience to make realistic predictions. As a company, our approach is to be intentionally conservative in making performance predictions. We live by our reputation and we want you to be very satisfied with your solar system. We’d rather lose the sale than make an overly-optimistic prediction and have you end up disappointed in a couple of years. Our company mantra is, under-promise and over-deliver. We feel it’s the best way to be as a company. And it is one of the reasons why we are a B Corp.
We build great solar electric systems. We under-promise and over-deliver. And we sleep very well at night.
The percentage of annual utility offset you can achieve with solar is driven by several factors, starting with how much energy your house uses. The size of the solar panel system, the type of panels used, and the orientation and shading of solar panels determine the clean energy output that is possible.
In some case, when a customer wanted to produce more power than their rooftop size would allow, we have built a combination system using rooftop and ground-mounted solar panels. We have also used solar panels to build awnings and other shade structures.
Alternatively, we recommend using SunPower modules to maximize your clean energy output. SunPower panels are unparalleled in terms of energy production. They have the highest output per square foot and deliver more energy per kW, year over year, than other modules. However, that extra efficiency costs more to achieve. So, if your primary consideration is maximum performance, then you should go with SunPower. If your primary constraint is cost, then we recommend one of our other brands of modules.
One of the reasons many people prefer Smart Solar Financing over leasing is that it is simply a better deal. With a lease, several companies and their investors all need to earn a profit. When YOU own the system, there is only ONE investor – you. With solar ownership, all of the financial return goes to you, so that even if a solar project in OH doesn’t have enough of a return to please the tax equity investors, venture capitalists and others that seek to make money through solar leases, it DOES make financial sense when YOU are the investor. As the owner of the system, you can take the Federal Tax Credit, sell your SRECs, and benefit from stable energy prices over time, as utility rates rise.
All solar panels lose a small amount of performance every year. Exposure to direct sunlight puts physical wear-and-tear on any material — think of lawn furniture, decking or shingles. The performance degradation of solar panels is expected and is very slight, only one-half of one percent per year. The panels are warranted to produce at least 80% of their rated power at year 25. In fact, they will continue producing power long after that, just a little bit less each year.
For efficiency sake, we have a large supply of Trina solar panels. Trina is a world-class supplier of high-quality panels. Using them enables to us to use the highest quality equipment at the best prices and maintain a very efficient delivery operation.
However, we are not wed to any one manufacturer. There are approximately 80 solar panel manufacturers offering about 600 different makes and models of equipment. One of the values we bring to our customers is that we can select the very best equipment for your particular job.
When choosing solar panels, we have three filters:
- technology platform
- specific performance and industry reputation
- financial stability of the manufacturer
We are very careful in selecting quality solar panels from top-tier companies that will have the longevity to honor the warranties for their equipment. We offer many different solutions that are comparable in efficiency. We can also offer ARRA compliant solar panels (American Content) if that is a requirement.
We are also an Authorized Dealer of SunPower systems, which are the most efficient and energy dense solar panel available. There is a premium price differentiation for SunPower, but you can achieve more electrical output per square foot if you install a SunPower system, which would increase your system size and overall annual utility offset. SunPower is also a terrific solution when the roof is small but you want to maximize the amount of clean energy produced.
We have experience with installing both micro-inverter systems as well as centralized inverters systems and can help to accommodate what is best for your renewable energy and project goals. One obvious diffidence between micro-inverters in comparison to centralized inverters is an increase in price to install micro-inverters.
Some pros for micro-inverters:
- ad hoc expandability
- optimal performance under shaded conditions
Micro-inverters can, in theory, allow for easier incremental expansion of a solar array. But there are still the costs associated with mobilizing the crew and the question of racking. Do we build the whole rack now, or built the racking out in phases as well? Depending on the roof, this could be a limiting factor. Also, you can’t just keep adding micro-inverters forever. Even micro-inverters have limitations on how many can be connected together. If we install close to that limit today, then you’ll still be limited in future.
Some cons for micro-inverters:
- They are installed on the roof under the solar panels where high heat could reduce their life, whereas central inverters are installed elsewhere, and have a documented history of reliable performance
- Using micro-inverters increases the number of inverters for potential service repairs
- Currently, micro-inverters cost more.
Micro inverters can also create more potential future maintenance risk. With a central inverter, you have a single point of failure; with micro-inverters, you have many points of failure.
In our opinion, micro-inverters are not worth using if you have a large, simple roof, without much shading. However, micro-inverters can be worth the added cost if you have a complex roof, where the modules will have multiple orientations, or complex shading patterns.
Most important to remember is that micro-inverters are still new technology and have not been proven enough yet to wear their “25 year warranty” with any kind of credibility.
Why on the roof? Why not on the ground?
We can build solar panel systems on the roof or on the ground. Rooftop solar offers a lower-cost option. The roof is an existing structure that can usually serve well as a mounting surface for solar panels.
A ground-mounted solar system requires a foundation and may demand a long underground wire run back to the house.We have built many ground-mounted systems, usually at a slightly higher cost than a roof mount.
Either type of installation can work well. We can provide whichever option you prefer, and we will advise you as to our opinion of which will work best in your case.
Solar panel subsidies and incentives might increase in the future—if I install solar panels now, will I miss out on solar panel incentives?
There are two broad classes of solar incentives: Purchase-based incentives and Performance-based incentives.
Purchase-based incentives are tied to the cost of the system, and apply one-time-only to the purchase of a new system using brand new equipment. They are designed to reduce or offset the initial cost of purchase. These incentives include tax credits (like the current Federal Tax Credit of 30% on renewable energy systems), low-interest loans, grants, and rebates.
Performance-based incentives are tied to the ongoing energy production of a solar system. There are several types of performance-based incentives, including Feed-in-tariffs, performance payments, Solar Renewable Energy Certificate sales, and a range of Carbon-tax or Carbon Cap & Trade mechanisms. What all performance-based incentives share is a solar income/savings structure based on the quarterly or annual output of the solar energy system—not a one-time-only payment, but an ongoing revenue stream as clean electricity is produced.
In a purchase-based incentive, the system owner must purchase the system within the time constraints of that particular incentive program. Performance-based incentives can apply equally to new and existing systems.
For several years now, the solar industry has been trending away from purchase-based incentives and toward performance-based incentives. This trend is expected to continue at both the state and federal level.
The advantage of this trend is that it makes project timing less critical—there is no need to wait for some potential future incentive. If and when that future incentive arrives, it will most likely take the form of a performance-based incentive and therefore be available to owners of existing solar energy systems.